'Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation' arXiv paper identifies the gap in benchmark-tooling infrastructure that single-benchmark leaderboards can't fill
The Holistic Agent Leaderboard arXiv paper (2510.11977) identifies the structural gap in agent-evaluation infrastructure — single-benchmark leaderboards can't capture the multi-dimensional capability profile that procurement decisions require. The paper proposes infrastructure for cross-benchmark holistic evaluation alongside the established single-benchmark leaderboards.
The substantive piece is the evaluation-infrastructure-gap framing. The 'six benchmarks that matter' consolidation through H1 2026 gave procurement teams a shared vocabulary but no integrated cross-benchmark evaluation infrastructure. The Holistic Agent Leaderboard proposal addresses the integration gap — letting procurement teams evaluate vendors across all six benchmarks plus emerging benchmarks (AgencyBench, OSUniverse, PaperBench, InnovatorBench) in a unified framework.
The competitive read against the UC Berkeley reward-hacking finding is that holistic-leaderboard infrastructure also addresses gaming concerns — exploiting a single benchmark is easier than exploiting multiple benchmarks simultaneously. The H2 2026 to 2027 agent-evaluation research direction should integrate holistic-evaluation infrastructure with reward-hacking-resistant scoring methodology.
arXiv — Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation → · Decode The Future — AI Agent Benchmarks 2026: 6 Tests That Matter →