'Demanding and Designing Aligned Cognitive Architectures' arXiv 2112.10190 — foundational paper on architectural-alignment direction continues to influence the H2 2026 design-principle interpretation
The 'Demanding and Designing Aligned Cognitive Architectures' arXiv paper (2112.10190) addresses the foundational question of how to design cognitive architectures that are aligned by construction rather than aligned through post-hoc training. The paper's framing influences the H2 2026 'interpretability as design principle' direction — both treat alignment as architectural concern rather than post-training adjustment.
The substantive piece is the design-by-construction versus post-hoc-training framing distinction. Pre-paper alignment research dominantly focused on post-hoc training adjustments (RLHF, constitutional AI, DPO) applied to pre-trained models. The foundational paper argues for architectural choices that produce alignment by construction — at design time rather than training time. The framing remains influential for H2 2026 interpretability-as-design-principle direction.
The competitive read against 'Interpretability as Alignment Design Principle' is that the architectural-alignment direction has multi-year intellectual roots and is now producing operational methodology proposals. The H2 2026 to 2027 alignment-research direction may bifurcate between continued post-hoc training methodology (RLHF refinements) and architectural-alignment methodology (design-principle approaches).
arXiv — Demanding and Designing Aligned Cognitive Architectures (2112.10190) → · arXiv — Interpretability as Alignment: Making Internal Understanding a Design Principle →