'MiroEval' arXiv 2603.28407 — multimodal deep research agent evaluation in process AND outcome dimensions, fills the multimodal-research-agent benchmark gap
The MiroEval arXiv paper (2603.28407) introduces benchmarking for multimodal deep research agents on both process and outcome dimensions. The benchmark fills the multimodal-research-agent evaluation gap — agents that combine multimodal capability with deep research workflows have specific evaluation requirements that text-only deep research benchmarks (DREAM) don't address.
The substantive piece is the process-plus-outcome dual evaluation. Pre-MiroEval deep research evaluation focused on outcome quality (was the final research output correct, comprehensive). Process evaluation addresses the intermediate research workflow — search strategy, source synthesis, contradiction handling. The dual evaluation matters because outcome-only evaluation can miss agents that produce correct final outputs through unreliable processes that won't generalize to novel scenarios.
The competitive read against Efficient Benchmarking's methodology improvements + the Evolutionary Perspectives survey is that the H2 2026 agent-evaluation research direction is systematically maturing — process-plus-outcome dual evaluation, multimodal-specific evaluation, scientific-research-specific evaluation, efficient subset-based evaluation, comprehensive field-survey. Each addresses a specific evaluation-infrastructure dimension.
arXiv — MiroEval: Benchmarking Multimodal Deep Research Agents in Process and Outcome (2603.28407) → · arXiv — DREAM: Deep Research Evaluation with Agentic Metrics →