'AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents' arXiv paper proposes process-and-outcome integrated evaluation framework — addresses what outcome-only leaderboards miss
The AgentAtlas arXiv paper (2605.20530) proposes an evaluation framework that integrates process metrics with outcome metrics for LLM agents. Outcome-only leaderboards (current state of practice) miss process-quality information — how the agent reached the outcome, which steps failed and retried, what tools were used. AgentAtlas operationalizes process-and-outcome integrated evaluation.
The substantive piece is the process-quality evaluation dimension. Outcome-only agent evaluation (current six-benchmark practice) measures whether the agent completed the task — pass/fail, completion-rate, accuracy. Process-quality evaluation adds dimensions: efficiency (token consumption, tool-call count), reliability (retry rate, failure recovery), debuggability (interpretability of process steps). For production-deployment procurement decisions, process quality matters as much as outcome quality.
The competitive read for H2 2026 to 2027 agent evaluation infrastructure is that process-quality integration becomes a procurement-evaluation requirement alongside outcome benchmarks. AgentAtlas's process-and-outcome framework, the Holistic Agent Leaderboard infrastructure, and reward-hacking-resistant scoring together represent the evaluation-methodology direction the field needs.
arXiv — AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents →